New Components - eventzilla #16838
New Components - eventzilla #16838
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThis update implements a complete Eventzilla app integration, introducing a robust API client, paginated data handling, and three new polling source components: "New Event Created," "New Attendee Added," and "New Event Transaction." Each source emits events based on Eventzilla activity, with supporting test data and a shared base module for code reuse. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Scheduler/Timer
participant SourceComponent
participant EventzillaClient
participant EventzillaAPI
Scheduler/Timer->>SourceComponent: Trigger poll (run)
SourceComponent->>EventzillaClient: getPaginatedResources({fn, args, resourceKey})
loop Pagination
EventzillaClient->>EventzillaAPI: API request (listEvents/listAttendees/listEventTransactions)
EventzillaAPI-->>EventzillaClient: Response (items, paging info)
EventzillaClient->>SourceComponent: Yield item(s)
end
SourceComponent->>SourceComponent: generateMeta(item)
SourceComponent->>Scheduler/Timer: $emit(item, meta)
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/eventzilla/eventzilla.app.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/eventzilla/sources/new-attendee-added/new-attendee-added.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/eventzilla/sources/common/base.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-transaction/new-event-transaction.mjs (1)
21-43: Consider adding error handling for edge cases.The method implementations are clean and follow expected patterns. However, consider adding error handling for potential edge cases:
- What happens if
item.checkout_idis undefined or null?- Should there be validation for the eventId parameter?
Consider this enhancement for robustness:
getSummary(item) { - return `New Event Transaction ID: ${item.checkout_id}`; + return `New Event Transaction ID: ${item.checkout_id || 'Unknown'}`; }, generateMeta(item) { + if (!item.checkout_id) { + throw new Error("Transaction item missing checkout_id"); + } return { id: item.checkout_id, summary: this.getSummary(item), ts: Date.now(), }; },components/eventzilla/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
21-23: Consider making getResourceKey() abstract.The method returns
undefinedby default, which could cause issues if a subclass forgets to implement it and the API expects a resource key.Consider throwing a ConfigurationError like the other abstract methods to ensure proper implementation:
- getResourceKey() { - return; - }, + getResourceKey() { + throw new ConfigurationError("getResourceKey is not implemented"); + },components/eventzilla/eventzilla.app.mjs (1)
45-66: Add error handling to API methods.The individual API methods (
listEvents,listAttendees,listEventTransactions) don't have explicit error handling, which could make debugging difficult.Consider adding error handling to provide better error messages:
listEvents(opts = {}) { - return this._makeRequest({ - path: "/events", - ...opts, - }); + try { + return this._makeRequest({ + path: "/events", + ...opts, + }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to list events: ${error.message}`); + } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
components/eventzilla/eventzilla.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/eventzilla/package.json(2 hunks)components/eventzilla/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/eventzilla/sources/new-attendee-added/new-attendee-added.mjs(1 hunks)components/eventzilla/sources/new-attendee-added/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-created/new-event-created.mjs(1 hunks)components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-created/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-transaction/new-event-transaction.mjs(1 hunks)components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-transaction/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (15)
components/eventzilla/sources/new-attendee-added/test-event.mjs (1)
1-19: LGTM! Well-structured test data.The test data provides a comprehensive sample attendee record with consistent field values. The zero transaction amount aligns properly with the "Free" payment type, and the data structure covers all the key attendee attributes needed for testing.
components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-transaction/test-event.mjs (1)
1-21: LGTM! Comprehensive transaction test data.The test data provides a complete transaction record with all monetary fields appropriately set to zero for a free transaction. The structure covers all necessary transaction attributes and maintains consistency with the payment type.
components/eventzilla/package.json (2)
3-3: Appropriate version increment.The minor version bump from 0.6.0 to 0.7.0 correctly reflects the addition of new source components, following semantic versioning conventions for new features.
16-16: Platform dependency update looks good.The patch update from ^3.0.0 to ^3.0.3 should be safe and likely includes beneficial bug fixes or improvements.
components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-created/test-event.mjs (1)
1-27: LGTM! Comprehensive event test data.The test data provides a thorough event record covering all essential attributes including dates, timezone, venue, URLs, and configuration. The data structure is well-organized and realistic for testing event creation scenarios.
components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-transaction/new-event-transaction.mjs (3)
1-11: LGTM! Well-structured component setup.The component properly extends the common base, follows naming conventions, and has appropriate metadata. The dedupe strategy "unique" is suitable for transaction monitoring.
12-20: Good use of prop definitions.Using propDefinition for eventId promotes consistency across components and leverages the centralized event options from the main app module.
44-46: LGTM! Proper sample emit integration.The sample emit import and usage follows the established pattern for providing example data to users.
components/eventzilla/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
1-16: LGTM! Well-structured base module.The imports, props definition, and overall structure follow Pipedream conventions and provide good foundations for source components.
components/eventzilla/sources/new-attendee-added/new-attendee-added.mjs (1)
1-39: LGTM! Clean implementation of the attendee source component.The component properly extends the base module and implements all required methods correctly. The use of propDefinitions for eventId and the clear method implementations follow Pipedream best practices.
components/eventzilla/sources/new-event-created/new-event-created.mjs (1)
1-25: LGTM! Proper implementation for event listing.The component correctly implements the required methods for listing all events. The absence of
getArgs()override is appropriate since no filtering parameters are needed for the events endpoint.components/eventzilla/eventzilla.app.mjs (4)
8-28: LGTM! Well-implemented propDefinition with pagination.The eventId propDefinition correctly implements async options with pagination, providing a good user experience for event selection.
31-44: LGTM! Proper API client setup.The base URL and request method are correctly implemented with proper authentication headers.
97-104: LGTM! Clean pagination collection method.The
getPaginatedResourcesmethod properly collects all paginated items using the async generator pattern.
67-96:✅ Verification successful
Verify pagination logic for edge cases.
The pagination implementation is complex and may have edge cases that could cause infinite loops or missed data.
Please verify this pagination logic handles these scenarios correctly:
- Empty responses
- Responses with fewer items than the limit
- API errors during pagination
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for similar pagination patterns in the codebase to compare implementations # Search for other paginate implementations rg -A 10 -B 2 "async \*paginate" --type jsLength of output: 44
Pagination logic verified
I’ve confirmed that the generator:
- Stops immediately on empty responses (
if (!items?.length) return).- Breaks out when the returned batch is smaller than the
limit(thewhile (total === limit)guard).- Propagates API errors by throwing from the
await fn(args)call, which cleanly halts iteration.No changes are required for correct pagination. If you need to handle request failures more gracefully, consider wrapping the
await fn(args)in atry/catchand deciding how to proceed on error.
luancazarine
left a comment
luancazarine
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @michelle0927, LGTM! Ready for QA!
Resolves #13252
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements